Crooked Attorney Hal Wright, And Differences Of Opinion

Regarding (my former) crooked attorney Hal Wright, I understand he is continuing to characterize his legal problems as merely a difference of opinion, of the sort that reasonable people with agreeable dispositions could settle equably, if only allowed the opportunity. Perhaps he is right. Trouble is, his difference of opinion includes the fine justices of the Supreme Court of California - every single individual one of them, since the Supreme Court met to consider his disbarment 'en banc'. Hal has a lot of persuading to do: