 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sunday, December 04, 2011
Rock 'N' Roll Christmas - DMTC
Turn Your Back For A Minute, And: Leaves Everywhere!
Well, not precisely a minute. More like a long, windy week.In any event, I now know how I'll spend my weekend!
"Tentacly"
A friend was conversing with me today, and she wanted to use the word "technically" in conversation. Oddly, the word didn't come out as "technically": it came out as "tentacly".
This was tentacly an error of speech, but it has much to recommend it - the imagery is great! - so I suggest we all adopt that usage, henceforth.
This was tentacly an error of speech, but it has much to recommend it - the imagery is great! - so I suggest we all adopt that usage, henceforth.
Saturday, December 03, 2011
Thinking Tonight About Science Fiction
There was an interesting biography tonight on TV about science fiction author Philip K. Dick. Dick's paranoid style eventually won him many converts in Hollywood (Blade Runner; Minority Report), but he was only one of a large cohort of authors in the Sixties that shaped my worldview (e.g. Clifford D. Simak, Frank Herbert, Isaac Asimov, etc.)
I stopped reading science fiction as a sophomore in college, so I hardly read much of what Dick wrote, but it got me to thinking about science fiction in general.
I remember being strangely affected by Philip Jose Farmer's short story called "Prometheus", first published in 1961, but republished in a 1971 collection of short stories called "Down In The Black Gang":
I stopped reading science fiction as a sophomore in college, so I hardly read much of what Dick wrote, but it got me to thinking about science fiction in general.
I remember being strangely affected by Philip Jose Farmer's short story called "Prometheus", first published in 1961, but republished in a 1971 collection of short stories called "Down In The Black Gang":
Prometheus is set in the 23rd Century and relates the misadventures of one John Carmody, a monk of the order of St. Jairus. Attacked by hoodlums in a zoo on Earth, Carmody has the misfortune to fall into the enclosure housing a horowitz - a giant bird from the planet Feral - which holds him down with one foot and proceeds to lay an egg on his chest! Carmody manages to escape from the closure, but discovers that the egg has put out tendrils and attached itself permanently to his chest!As a blogger, I sometimes feel like the hapless conman-turned-monk John Carmody, forced by accident to bear heavy burdens and destined to discover rather late in life his true calling: preaching to the Galaxy's most intelligent nonsentient beings. I can relate.
Carmody's plight becomes a golden opportunity for zoologists, who believe the horowitzes to be the Galaxy's most intelligent nonsentient beings. Not only can they now study the embryo's development in the egg, but they also convince the hapless monk to go to Feral and impersonate a horowitz to help gather scientific data.
Friday, December 02, 2011
Progress Marches On
There once was a time, not long ago, when the rabble would shout insults at their betters, and their betters walked on, in blithe ignorance of the insults. But today, with the Internet, you can now irritate your betters, and they can hurl insults back. That's progress, of a sort.
My friend, Jetta, was skeptical of Roseanne Barr's argument in support of the Green Party, and she got a response:
My friend, Jetta, was skeptical of Roseanne Barr's argument in support of the Green Party, and she got a response:
@TheRealRoseanne In reality only one of these parties will win, your party is takeing away the Dems vote.Progress!
@JOstrofsky think again idiot-Im taking twice the votes from repubs-look into the fact that u can b smart and NOT a democrat
Super Tush
Super size it!:Florida police on Friday arrested a person suspected of administering dangerous and illegal butt-boosting shots – injecting at least one woman with a cocktail of substances including cement, glue and tire sealant.And what were those complications?:
The person is 30-year-old Oneal Ron Morris, who was born a man but who identifies as a woman. Morris is pictured above.
...“They agreed on the price of $700 for the procedure, which was intended for cosmetic purposes,” Bamford said.
What the woman got for her money was a series of injections containing a bizarre concoction of cement, super glue, mineral oil and Fix-A-Flat tire inflator and sealant, police said.
Bamford said that the procedure was conducted not in a clinic, but in a residential setting in Miami Gardens, and that shortly after the substance was injected into the woman’s body she developed what Bamford termed “severe complications.”
She first went to Jackson North Medical Center in North Miami-Dade. The doctors looked her over, but were somewhat perplexed by her symptoms. She was afraid to tell them what she had done and left before they finished her exam. She then drove to North Shore Medical Center, where doctors also were mystified.
She again left before being treated and returned home. She unsuccessfully tried to reach Morris for several days.
Almost two weeks later, the victim’s mother saw a news report of a similar victim being treated at a hospital in Tampa.
With her daughter still sick, she drove her to Tampa General Hospital, where doctors treated her for what they believed was a staph infection. She finally told them what she had done and one of her doctors desperately tried to reach Morris to find out what was used so that they could treat the woman.
Jeesh, It Was Windy!
Bruce takes note of the ABQ wind:
Regarding precipitation, this winter season started promisingly enough in October, but since the beginning of November it's been so dry! La Nina's revenge! That damned equatorial phenomenon just won't quit! The dry weather is beginning to remind me of that dread drought year 1977 again. I hope things start looking up soon!
[L]ink gives the low down and high down on strong winds in Duke City yesterday. They were really howling last night around our apartment in the Heights. Highest gust was 88 mph at Tram in Sandias yesterday afternoon, so they wisely shut it down.That’s interesting! It was pretty windy here in Sacramento too, as the low pressure system dug into the SW, but the winds here were not nearly as strong as in either S. CA, or it sounds like NM. Apparently Mammoth Mtn. saw winds in excess of 150 mph: so high they couldn’t accurately be measured.
However, we did have those incredible 135mph Santa Ana winds that blew off gas station roofs and knocked out power for more than 100,000 is LA and southern Calif. valley areas.
Regarding precipitation, this winter season started promisingly enough in October, but since the beginning of November it's been so dry! La Nina's revenge! That damned equatorial phenomenon just won't quit! The dry weather is beginning to remind me of that dread drought year 1977 again. I hope things start looking up soon!
Frank Luntz Tries To Outflank The Occupy Movement
Struggling to catch up with the parade, by changing the meaning of all the language. But Luntz's cluelessness is telling. People know the bonuses are out there; it's just that they aren't getting any:
"I'm so scared of this anti-Wall Street effort. I'm frightened to death," said Frank Luntz, a Republican strategist and one of the nation's foremost experts on crafting the perfect political message. "They're having an impact on what the American people think of capitalism."
Luntz offered tips on how Republicans could discuss the grievances of the Occupiers, and help the governors better handle all these new questions from constituents about "income inequality" and "paying your fair share."
Yahoo News sat in on the session, and counted 10 do's and don'ts from Luntz covering how Republicans should fight back by changing the way they discuss the movement....BONUS:
Don't say 'bonus!'
Luntz advised that if they give their employees an income boost during the holiday season, they should never refer to it as a "bonus."
"If you give out a bonus at a time of financial hardship, you're going to make people angry. It's 'pay for performance.'"
Thursday, December 01, 2011
The GOP Goes All Medieval On the Multimillionaires
Paul Krugman notes this:
In addition, Senate Republican leaders would go after “millionaires and billionaires,” not by raising their taxes but by making them ineligible for unemployment compensation and food stamps and increasing their Medicare premiums. Democrats said that this part of the Republican proposal was not serious, pointing out that high earners were already ineligible to receive food stamps.
Regarding The GOP Nominee Race
Bloggers offer their thoughts about Fox getting aggressive with Romney:
Romney and Gingrich are probably about as evenly matched as they can be, so now it's up to the voters to decide who has the greatest national reach. If Fox is now in Gingrich's pocket, that's all the national reach he really needs to get the nomination.
Where this situation leaves ideological and social conservatives is unclear. Many seem to loathe both candidates. They seem to loathe Gingrich less, however, so who knows?
But Fox News is a really top down operation. And it plays favorites, just as much within GOP politics as between the two parties themselves. As I’ve mentioned before, one of the biggest undiscussed parts of the GOP primary process is the Murdoch primary. This is part of that.For myself, I tend to look at these things from a regional point of view. Romney was going to be the Northern candidate. It was unclear who the Southern candidate was going to be, and after Cain and Perry both crashed, Murdoch decided to choose Gingrich. Both Murdoch and Gingrich are neo-Catholics, after all. They've shared a lot of history together.
And what does it say about Romney? It goes to a possibly pretty nasty line of attack against a newly vulnerable ‘frontrunner’ — basically that he can’t handle a fight or can’t take the heat. But in the always borderline-feral, gendered nature of campaign politics, even a bit more than that — that maybe Mitt’s not quite a man.
Nor is this out of character for Mitt. The guy doesn’t like getting questioned too hard or pressed too closely. That’s not altogether surprising given the life Mitt’s led. But he shows it. Remember the debate six weeks ago when Rick Perry finally took his geritol and managed to seriously get under Mitt’s skin on the illegal immigration issue? There’s a difficult to describe mix of surprise, put-off-edness and testiness that he exhibits in these cases.
Romney and Gingrich are probably about as evenly matched as they can be, so now it's up to the voters to decide who has the greatest national reach. If Fox is now in Gingrich's pocket, that's all the national reach he really needs to get the nomination.
Where this situation leaves ideological and social conservatives is unclear. Many seem to loathe both candidates. They seem to loathe Gingrich less, however, so who knows?
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
At the Dentist's
I like the supermodern facility, and the little panel on the wall, which indicates the room's status. There are four options for the panel's buttons, and as I left the room, the hygienist casually pressed the button for option two: the room had been 'Clean', but was now 'Dirty'.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Theater People Everywhere!
Went to Supercuts to get my hair cut. Started talking to hair dresser, who turned out to be Kalyn DeKreek, who's big in theater in Woodland.
Theater people everywhere! The walls have eyes (or at least scissors).
Theater people everywhere! The walls have eyes (or at least scissors).
A Worthy Newt Rant
There are two categories of people in the world: people who put things in two categories, and people who don't.
And there's Newt, of course:
And there's Newt, of course:
Over the last three decades, wealth has become increasingly concentrated at the top. The middle class is struggling with stagnant wages and a growing class gap; poverty rates are soaring; the jobs crisis seems never-ending; and a growing number of Americans are suggesting it’s time for a larger conversation about economic inequalities and tax fairness.
Newt Gingrich believes that conversation must not occur. In fact, the Republican presidential candidate questions the patriotism of those who choose to draw attention to the problem.“I repudiate, and I call on the President to repudiate, the concept of the 99 and the 1. It is un-American, it is divisive, it is historically false…. You are not going to get job creation when you engage in class warfare because you have to attack the very people you hope will create jobs.”...Since when is it consistent with the American tradition to try to shut down a debate over fairness and economic justice? For that matter, since when is it an “attack” on the extremely wealthy to ask them to pay Clinton/Gingrich-era tax rates that allowed the rich to thrive in the 1990s?
What’s more, let’s also not overlook Gingrich’s selective approach to unity. Today in South Carolina, Gingrich said it’s un-American and divisive to pit a majority against a minority. But as my friend Kyle Mantyla noted today, Gingrich said the opposite at the recent “One Nation Under God” event where he told religious right activists “that they are the majority in the country who must stand up and take this nation back from the ‘minority elite’ who are ruining it.”
So to recap, when it comes to the economy, Gingrich believes we’re all one people, and we must pay no attention to the wealth that divides us. When it comes to the culture war, we’re not one people, and those who believe as Gingrich does should target and defeat those Americans who disagree.
If a right-wing voice rails against the “minority elite,” he’s speaking the truth. If an Occupy activist rails against the “minority elite,” he’s an un-American radical.
Got it.
Speculation Separates The 1% From The 99%
Interesting post at Obsidian Wings.
At one time, the argument was fervently and sincerely made that executives should be recompensed heavily with stock options, because it ties their interests directly to their company's interests. In practice, that doesn't appear to be the case. Stock options aren't very useful unless the market is booming, and the market generally doesn't boom unless new money enters, which doesn't happen unless confidence is high. Creating an illusion of 'confidence' is crucial. So, speculation is far more important than tending the company's business, or job-creating, or even lobbying, or half a dozen more-industrious uses of their time and attention:
At one time, the argument was fervently and sincerely made that executives should be recompensed heavily with stock options, because it ties their interests directly to their company's interests. In practice, that doesn't appear to be the case. Stock options aren't very useful unless the market is booming, and the market generally doesn't boom unless new money enters, which doesn't happen unless confidence is high. Creating an illusion of 'confidence' is crucial. So, speculation is far more important than tending the company's business, or job-creating, or even lobbying, or half a dozen more-industrious uses of their time and attention:
The important point here is that even the people who look like they've made their money from a business outside the financial industry -- the Bill Gates or Steve Jobs types -- really haven't. They've made their money from *stocks*, not from selling things or services.
It's not just the wealth from the stocks of their companies, either. This chart of income sources for the top hundredth of a percent
shows that dividends -- direct shares in profits -- have become much less important since the 1970s, while "wages" have become much more important. It looks as though these extremely wealthy people are working for their money, doesn't it?
Except that "wages" includes stock options and bonuses, which are often based on stock price performance. So wealthy people who aren't getting money from S-corporations, sole proprietorships, and partnerships are getting almost all their income from capital stock/ real estate gains, and from stock-indexed wages.
And the stock market isn't really for investment, it's for *speculation*. "Give them money and get a percent of the profits" is investment, because you (the wealthy person) are tying your income to how much money the company actually takes in for doing things. "Buy low, sell high" is speculation, because how much money you get doesn't have to depend on anything the company actually sells or does -- all that matters is what potential buyers think, and their confidence that the stock will continue to be worth more in a market of people who think like them.
No wonder so many of our Very Serious Leaders keep saying "confidence" is of overwhelming importance, more important to businesspeople than things like "are there enough customers?" -- even though actual businesspeople are most concerned about lack of demand.
Maybe The End Of The World Starts Here
Think about all that vulnerable human biomass out there:
A group of scientists is pushing to publish research about how they created a man-made flu virus that could potentially wipe out civilisation.
The deadly virus is a genetically tweaked version of the H5N1 bird flu strain, but is far more infectious and could pass easily between millions of people at a time.
...Virologist Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Centre in the Netherlands lead a team of scientists who discovered that a mere five mutations to the avian virus was sufficient to make it spread far more easily.
...Fouchier admitted the strain is 'one of the most dangerous viruses you can make' but is still adamant he wants to publish a paper describing how it was done.
...Paul Keim, chairman of NSABB, said: 'I can't think of another pathogenic organism that is as scary as this one. I don't think anthrax is scary at all compared to this.'
Traditionally scientific research has always been open so that fellow scientists can review the work of others and repeat their methods to try and learn from them.
But numerous scientists have said they believe research on the avian flu should be suppressed.
The Year Of The Sex Olympics
Surfing on the waves of the Internet, checking out Jean Poole along the way and following her recommendation, I started reading this interesting essay about the origins of pessimism on the Left, and the prudent refusal of the Occupy movement to identify its aims, but soon started watching this futuristic TV show from 1968: "The Year Of The Sex Olympics".
(see the essay for the abbreviated video)
Well-done science fiction can be truly clairvoyant! We live in the near-future this TV show was designed for! Nigel Kneale foresaw Reality TV!
But what I thought most about were the big talent shows we have this day - American Idol, X-Factor, America's Got Talent; where you watch, not do - and the stark contrast with profoundly-subversive community musical theater, where you do, not watch:
(see the essay for the abbreviated video)
Well-done science fiction can be truly clairvoyant! We live in the near-future this TV show was designed for! Nigel Kneale foresaw Reality TV!
But what I thought most about were the big talent shows we have this day - American Idol, X-Factor, America's Got Talent; where you watch, not do - and the stark contrast with profoundly-subversive community musical theater, where you do, not watch:
'The Year Of The Sex Olympics' was written by the great TV writer Nigel Kneale (creator of Quatermass) and was originally aired on British TV on 29 July 1968. It was the penultimate play in the BBC series 'Theatre 625' which ran from 1964 to 1968. It was filmed in colour, but only black and white copies are known to exist. Directed by Michael Elliot, it starred Leonard Rossiter, Suzanne Neave, Tony Vogel and Brian Cox.
From the IMDb:
"Set in a future when the world is dominated and run by television, where language has become almost redundant and all 'tensions' - love, war, hate, loyalty - have been removed. Overpopulation is a problem, so there are gluttony programmes to put people off food and pornography programmes to put them off sex. There is artsex and sportsex, and now this - the year of the Sex Olympics. Audience attention begins to wane, however, until TV executive Ugo Priest works on a new concept - a reality-based programme in which a couple is stranded on a bleak island, without the aid of any modern technology, and their efforts to survive filmed twenty-four hours a day. A concept which may sound familiar in the age of reality TV... "
Monday, November 28, 2011
Herman Cain's Lawyer's Opening Gambit
Toss it against the wall and see if it sticks:
this appears to be an accusation of private, alleged consensual conduct between adults - a subject matter which is not a proper subject of inquiry by the media or the public. No individual, whether a private citizen, a candidate for public office or a public official, should be questioned about his or her private sexual life. The public's right to know and the media's right to report has boundaries and most certainly those boundaries end outside of one's bedroom door.But this wasn't the GOP standard back in Bill Clinton's presidency, was it?
The Ironman Gets Impatient
As any New Mexican could have anticipated, Gary Johnson is getting ignored on the national stage. So, he's thinking third-party:
Disgruntled former New Mexico governor Gary Johnson says he is considering leaving the Republican slate and running as a third-party candidate in the 2012 presidential election.
“I feel abandoned by the Republican Party,” Johnson, who has been left out of most of the Republican debates, told the Sante Fe New Mexican newspaper this week, saying he might seek the Libertarian Party’s support.
“The Republican Party has left me by the wayside,” said Johnson, whose polling numbers have recently been so low that they are often not even being picked up by pollsters.
...Johnson, 58, holds dear libertarian values such as low taxes and limited government and wants to legalize marijuana. He is also a fitness fanatic, having competed in a number of “Ironman” triathlons and climbed Mount Everest.
Top 100 (Or So) DMTC Lists
Playing around with the DMTC Master Cast List, I was curious about two questions:
This list inhales people and spews them out like spray paint on a highway overpass. It reminds me of another amusingly-jumbled set of lists I looked at, where Japanese TV viewers were asked to rate the most important people in history (based, in part, on their recollections of recent historical miniseries on Japanese TV).
Most Important People (number of lines of mentions in list)
1___Jan___Isaacson___591
2___Steve___Isaacson___487
3___Jean___Henderson___200
4___Dannette (Bell)___Vassar___193
5___Arthur___Vassar___111
6___Daniel___Pool___109
7___Mary___Young___109
8___Ben___Bruening___106
9___Marie___Petersen___102
10___Anna___Johnson___82
11___Ron___Cisneros___81
12___John___Ewing___79
13___Erik___Daniells___77
14___Marc___Valdez___73
15___Noël (Spellman)___Bruening___72
16___Jane___Butler___72
17___Cameron___Kuss___69
18___Jeni___Price___69
19___Chris___Adams___65
20___Nikki___Nicola___65
21___Eileen___Beaver___60
22___Leslie___Kuss___60
23___Salina___Morlang___60
24___Paul___Wurschmidt___56
25___Michael___Miiller___55
26___Dave___Chan___54
27___Mara___Bernhard___53
28___Valerie___Cogdill___52
29___Jonathan___Rothman___52
30___Rich___Kulmann___49
31___Megan___Houpt___46
32___Wendy (Young)___Carey___45
33___Tom___Gohring___45
34___Jennie___Reuter___45
35___Russ___Bruch___43
36___Julie___Kulmann___41
37___Jon___Mounts___41
38___Laura___Sitts___41
39___Marcia___Burns___40
40___Warren___Harrison___40
41___Dan___Stern___40
42___Scott___Griffith___39
43___Celeste___Hammon___39
44___Rand___Martin___39
45___Dian (Calahane, Becker)___Hoel___38
46___Bilene___Mason___38
47___Jocelyn___Price___38
48___Ron___Easley___37
49___Rick___Jones___37
50___Ben___Wormeli___37
51___Alene___Chandler___36
52___Jon___Daniells___36
53___Vivian___Krich-Brinton___36
54___Andrew___Lampinen___36
55___Bruce___Lampinen___36
56___Katherine___Gohring___35
57___Kay___Hight___35
58___Michael___McElroy___35
59___John___Reuter___35
60___Monica___Parisi___34
61___Lauren___Miller___33
62___Clifton___Wood___33
63___Linda___Abrille___32
64___Lindsay___Carpenter___32
65___Mark___Carpenter___32
66___Laura___Daniells___32
67___Andy___Sullivan___32
68___Mark___Allen___31
69___Charlotte___Gremillion___31
70___Keven___Morlang___31
71___Heather___Sheridan___31
72___Patrick___Stratton___31
73___Mark___Ashton___30
74___Gwyneth___Bruch___30
75___Deborah___Currier___30
76___Sharon___Reuter___30
77___Barbara___Ruhmann___30
78___Eva___Saur___30
79___Amy___Schoedel___30
80___David___Silva___30
81___Steve___Weigt___30
82___Ryan___Adame___29
83___Aly___Ivler___29
84___Danielle___Mason___29
85___Holly___Newell___29
86___Tim___O’Laughlin___29
87___Colin___Wallace___29
88___Natalie___Armstrong___28
89___Cheryl___Barker___28
90___Jon___Beaver___28
91___Hank___Cogdill___28
92___Janell___Gohring___28
93___Chris___Petersen___28
94___Scott___Sablan___28
95___Mary Jo___Seminoff___28
96___Julia___Spangler___28
97___Susan___Sullivan___28
98___Kelly___Daniells___27
99___Elliot___Mulberg___27
100___Karina (Summers)___Selvaggio___27
101___Jenny___Short___27
Most Frequently-Appearing Cast Members (number of mentions in list)
1___Jan___Isaacson___113
2___Mary___Young___75
3___Steve___Isaacson___69
4___Ben___Bruening___45
5___Dannette (Bell)___Vassar___45
6___Marc___Valdez___40
7___Wendy (Young)___Carey___38
8___Arthur___Vassar___34
9___Julie___Kulmann___32
10___Rich___Kulmann___31
11___Jocelyn___Price___28
12___Eva___Saur___27
13___Andrew___Lampinen___26
14___Laura___Sitts___25
15___Noël (Spellman)___Bruening___23
16___Lindsay___Carpenter___23
17___Scott___Griffith___23
18___Jennie___Reuter___23
19___McKinley___Carlisle___22
20___Katherine___Gohring___22
21___Dian (Calahane, Becker)___Hoel___22
22___Julia___Spangler___22
23___Colin___Wallace___22
24___Jon___Beaver___21
25___Ashley___Gohring___21
26___Rhiannon___Guevin___21
27___Vivian___Krich-Brinton___21
28___Danielle___Mason___21
29___Jon___Mounts___21
30___Eileen___Beaver___20
31___Hank___Cogdill___20
32___Holly___Newell___20
33___Nora___Unkel___20
34___Kelly___Daniells___19
35___Aly___Ivler___19
36___Leanne___Kuss___19
37___Lauren___Miller___19
38___Alison___Munn___19
39___Chris___Petersen___19
40___Paula___Short___19
41___Natalie___Armstrong___18
42___Russ___Bruch___18
43___Mark___Carpenter___18
44___Monica___Parisi___18
45___Amy___Schoedel___18
46___David___Silva___18
47___Nathan___Brown___17
48___Petra___Favorite___17
49___Michael___Miiller___17
50___Ryan___Adame___16
51___Warren___Harrison___16
52___Michael___Lewis___16
53___Natalie___Mo___16
54___Barbara___Ruhmann___16
55___Kara___Sheldon___16
56___Clifton___Wood___16
57___Juliana___Wynkoop___16
58___Kitri___Bakay___15
59___Gwyneth___Bruch___15
60___Erin___Carpenter___15
61___Paul___Fearn___15
62___Ashley___Hickman___15
63___Michael___Jenkinson___15
64___Linnea___Lampinen___15
65___Stacy___Sheehan___15
66___Edward___Bianchi IV___14
67___Julie___Bock___14
68___Kailani___Carlisle___14
69___Bridget___Egan___14
70___Tiffany___Fletcher___14
71___Michael___Manley___14
72___Tim___O’Laughlin___14
73___Cass___Olson___14
74___Mary Ellen___Price___14
75___Lenore (Gordon)___Sebastian___14
76___Cole___Stratton___14
77___Angela___Yee___14
78___Mara___Bernhard___13
79___Arlon___Carlson___13
80___Kyle___Cherry___13
81___Valerie___Cogdill___13
82___Cody___Craven___13
83___Matt___Dunn___13
84___Julie___Holmes___13
85___Jon___Jackson___13
86___Brian___McCann___13
87___Jason "Clocky"___McDowell___13
88___Michael___McElroy___13
89___Tara___Newell___13
90___Lisa___Parente___13
91___Rebecca___Rudy___13
92___Gil___Sebastian___13
93___Stacia___Truesdale___13
94___Kennedy___Wenning___13
95___Lisa___Bennett___12
96___Ana___Chan___12
97___Roger___Clark___12
98___Meeka___Craig___12
99___Lexi___DeRock___12
100___Janet___Evans___12
101___Rebecca___Evans___12
102___John___Ewing___12
103___Wil___Forkin___12
104___Caroline___Gohring___12
105___Amy___Henderson___12
106___David___Holmes___12
107___Andy___Hyun___12
108___Melissa___Kuss___12
109___Elena___Lipman___12
110___Rachel___Pinto___12
111___Christina___Rae___12
112___Adam___Sartain___12
113___Emily Jo___Seminoff___12
114___Don "Gemini"___Spotts___12
115___Patrick___Stratton___12
116___Shea___Stratton___12
117___Eimi (Stokes)___Taormina___12
118___John___Trent___12
119___Casey Marie___Wilson___12
120___Sarah___Yablon___12
121___Ginga___Zeidenberg___12
- Who are the most important people in DMTC production history (based on a very crude metric: the number of lines upon which their names appear in the list); and,
- Who has appeared the most number of times as cast members on the DMTC stage?
This list inhales people and spews them out like spray paint on a highway overpass. It reminds me of another amusingly-jumbled set of lists I looked at, where Japanese TV viewers were asked to rate the most important people in history (based, in part, on their recollections of recent historical miniseries on Japanese TV).
Most Important People (number of lines of mentions in list)
1___Jan___Isaacson___591
2___Steve___Isaacson___487
3___Jean___Henderson___200
4___Dannette (Bell)___Vassar___193
5___Arthur___Vassar___111
6___Daniel___Pool___109
7___Mary___Young___109
8___Ben___Bruening___106
9___Marie___Petersen___102
10___Anna___Johnson___82
11___Ron___Cisneros___81
12___John___Ewing___79
13___Erik___Daniells___77
14___Marc___Valdez___73
15___Noël (Spellman)___Bruening___72
16___Jane___Butler___72
17___Cameron___Kuss___69
18___Jeni___Price___69
19___Chris___Adams___65
20___Nikki___Nicola___65
21___Eileen___Beaver___60
22___Leslie___Kuss___60
23___Salina___Morlang___60
24___Paul___Wurschmidt___56
25___Michael___Miiller___55
26___Dave___Chan___54
27___Mara___Bernhard___53
28___Valerie___Cogdill___52
29___Jonathan___Rothman___52
30___Rich___Kulmann___49
31___Megan___Houpt___46
32___Wendy (Young)___Carey___45
33___Tom___Gohring___45
34___Jennie___Reuter___45
35___Russ___Bruch___43
36___Julie___Kulmann___41
37___Jon___Mounts___41
38___Laura___Sitts___41
39___Marcia___Burns___40
40___Warren___Harrison___40
41___Dan___Stern___40
42___Scott___Griffith___39
43___Celeste___Hammon___39
44___Rand___Martin___39
45___Dian (Calahane, Becker)___Hoel___38
46___Bilene___Mason___38
47___Jocelyn___Price___38
48___Ron___Easley___37
49___Rick___Jones___37
50___Ben___Wormeli___37
51___Alene___Chandler___36
52___Jon___Daniells___36
53___Vivian___Krich-Brinton___36
54___Andrew___Lampinen___36
55___Bruce___Lampinen___36
56___Katherine___Gohring___35
57___Kay___Hight___35
58___Michael___McElroy___35
59___John___Reuter___35
60___Monica___Parisi___34
61___Lauren___Miller___33
62___Clifton___Wood___33
63___Linda___Abrille___32
64___Lindsay___Carpenter___32
65___Mark___Carpenter___32
66___Laura___Daniells___32
67___Andy___Sullivan___32
68___Mark___Allen___31
69___Charlotte___Gremillion___31
70___Keven___Morlang___31
71___Heather___Sheridan___31
72___Patrick___Stratton___31
73___Mark___Ashton___30
74___Gwyneth___Bruch___30
75___Deborah___Currier___30
76___Sharon___Reuter___30
77___Barbara___Ruhmann___30
78___Eva___Saur___30
79___Amy___Schoedel___30
80___David___Silva___30
81___Steve___Weigt___30
82___Ryan___Adame___29
83___Aly___Ivler___29
84___Danielle___Mason___29
85___Holly___Newell___29
86___Tim___O’Laughlin___29
87___Colin___Wallace___29
88___Natalie___Armstrong___28
89___Cheryl___Barker___28
90___Jon___Beaver___28
91___Hank___Cogdill___28
92___Janell___Gohring___28
93___Chris___Petersen___28
94___Scott___Sablan___28
95___Mary Jo___Seminoff___28
96___Julia___Spangler___28
97___Susan___Sullivan___28
98___Kelly___Daniells___27
99___Elliot___Mulberg___27
100___Karina (Summers)___Selvaggio___27
101___Jenny___Short___27
Most Frequently-Appearing Cast Members (number of mentions in list)
1___Jan___Isaacson___113
2___Mary___Young___75
3___Steve___Isaacson___69
4___Ben___Bruening___45
5___Dannette (Bell)___Vassar___45
6___Marc___Valdez___40
7___Wendy (Young)___Carey___38
8___Arthur___Vassar___34
9___Julie___Kulmann___32
10___Rich___Kulmann___31
11___Jocelyn___Price___28
12___Eva___Saur___27
13___Andrew___Lampinen___26
14___Laura___Sitts___25
15___Noël (Spellman)___Bruening___23
16___Lindsay___Carpenter___23
17___Scott___Griffith___23
18___Jennie___Reuter___23
19___McKinley___Carlisle___22
20___Katherine___Gohring___22
21___Dian (Calahane, Becker)___Hoel___22
22___Julia___Spangler___22
23___Colin___Wallace___22
24___Jon___Beaver___21
25___Ashley___Gohring___21
26___Rhiannon___Guevin___21
27___Vivian___Krich-Brinton___21
28___Danielle___Mason___21
29___Jon___Mounts___21
30___Eileen___Beaver___20
31___Hank___Cogdill___20
32___Holly___Newell___20
33___Nora___Unkel___20
34___Kelly___Daniells___19
35___Aly___Ivler___19
36___Leanne___Kuss___19
37___Lauren___Miller___19
38___Alison___Munn___19
39___Chris___Petersen___19
40___Paula___Short___19
41___Natalie___Armstrong___18
42___Russ___Bruch___18
43___Mark___Carpenter___18
44___Monica___Parisi___18
45___Amy___Schoedel___18
46___David___Silva___18
47___Nathan___Brown___17
48___Petra___Favorite___17
49___Michael___Miiller___17
50___Ryan___Adame___16
51___Warren___Harrison___16
52___Michael___Lewis___16
53___Natalie___Mo___16
54___Barbara___Ruhmann___16
55___Kara___Sheldon___16
56___Clifton___Wood___16
57___Juliana___Wynkoop___16
58___Kitri___Bakay___15
59___Gwyneth___Bruch___15
60___Erin___Carpenter___15
61___Paul___Fearn___15
62___Ashley___Hickman___15
63___Michael___Jenkinson___15
64___Linnea___Lampinen___15
65___Stacy___Sheehan___15
66___Edward___Bianchi IV___14
67___Julie___Bock___14
68___Kailani___Carlisle___14
69___Bridget___Egan___14
70___Tiffany___Fletcher___14
71___Michael___Manley___14
72___Tim___O’Laughlin___14
73___Cass___Olson___14
74___Mary Ellen___Price___14
75___Lenore (Gordon)___Sebastian___14
76___Cole___Stratton___14
77___Angela___Yee___14
78___Mara___Bernhard___13
79___Arlon___Carlson___13
80___Kyle___Cherry___13
81___Valerie___Cogdill___13
82___Cody___Craven___13
83___Matt___Dunn___13
84___Julie___Holmes___13
85___Jon___Jackson___13
86___Brian___McCann___13
87___Jason "Clocky"___McDowell___13
88___Michael___McElroy___13
89___Tara___Newell___13
90___Lisa___Parente___13
91___Rebecca___Rudy___13
92___Gil___Sebastian___13
93___Stacia___Truesdale___13
94___Kennedy___Wenning___13
95___Lisa___Bennett___12
96___Ana___Chan___12
97___Roger___Clark___12
98___Meeka___Craig___12
99___Lexi___DeRock___12
100___Janet___Evans___12
101___Rebecca___Evans___12
102___John___Ewing___12
103___Wil___Forkin___12
104___Caroline___Gohring___12
105___Amy___Henderson___12
106___David___Holmes___12
107___Andy___Hyun___12
108___Melissa___Kuss___12
109___Elena___Lipman___12
110___Rachel___Pinto___12
111___Christina___Rae___12
112___Adam___Sartain___12
113___Emily Jo___Seminoff___12
114___Don "Gemini"___Spotts___12
115___Patrick___Stratton___12
116___Shea___Stratton___12
117___Eimi (Stokes)___Taormina___12
118___John___Trent___12
119___Casey Marie___Wilson___12
120___Sarah___Yablon___12
121___Ginga___Zeidenberg___12
Romeo Void - Never Say Never
Getting my Eighties groove on, with Romeo Void. Vocalist Debora Iyall was the unlikeliest pop diva of the decade:
The sudden surge in popularity was disorienting to Iyall. "It was frightening: we played a college in Santa Barbara, and there were all these blond people crowding the stage, and I thought 'These are the people who hated me in high school!' When you grow up being 'outside' -- because I wasn't white, and I was fat, and always a bit of a free thinker -- it was strange. It was like, 'uh-oh, I must be doing something wrong -- they like me!'"
Kelsey B - Boy If You Only Knew
Kelsey B's official video is out!
Serendipity is on Kelsey's side. Cousins of her co-stars were big draws this weekend at the cinema!
Kansastan, Kansastan, You Very Nice Place!
No one pulled back from the forward trenches in the Great Kansas Tweet Incident for the longest time:
Please stand, for Borat's rendition of the Kazakhstan National Anthem:
But finally, today, Great Leader Of Kansastan declared mercy on sniveling, coddled Ute In Government:
Over-reacting staff will volunteer to be strapped to fence posts and function instead as tornado early-warning system.
Last week, during a Kansas Youth in Government field trip, Sullivan watched Gov. Sam Brownback speak. Unmoved, she cavalierly tweeted to her roughly 65 followers, “Just made mean comments at gov. brownback and told him he sucked, in person #heblowsalot.”All of this reminds me of other places on the globe where national leaders insist on respect from their citizens.
...Sure enough, Brownback’s office – the Thin Skin Division — noted Sullivan’s tweet, and contacted Youth in Government. As Sherriene Jones-Sontag, Brownback’s communications director, explained to the Kansas City Star, “That wasn’t respectful. In order to really have a constructive dialogue, there has to be mutual respect.” She added, “It was important for the organization to be aware of the comments their students were making.”
Sullivan was soon called into the principal’s office, where she says she received a one-hour scolding on her “not so nice” behavior and told she needed to do “damage control” in the form of a letter of apology. Oh, but the damage was just beginning.
You see, the girl, who didn’t even meet Brownback — let alone tell him to his face that he sucks — isn’t sorry. Nor does she feel the need to offer a hollow apology. Instead, she tweeted Sunday, “I’ve decided not to write the letter but I hope this opens the door for average citizens to voice their opinion & to be heard!” Suddenly, #heblowsalot is the hashtag to beat.
It’s quite likely that Jones-Sontag read the original tweet, jumped to the hasty conclusion that a confrontation had occurred, and decided to take swift action. And had Sullivan been truly disruptive and abusive during a school event, organizers would be entitled to know. But she wasn’t, and that makes Jones-Sontag and principal Karl R. Krawitz look increasingly absurd for getting whipped up over the blithe tweets of a teenager. Jones-Sontag could have backed up and said, “We misread the events. We never demanded an apology. And differences of opinion are what makes this country great.” But she didn’t. So now it’s a big deal, one that pits a mouthy adolescent’s right to say her governor sucks against a bunch of adults who’d prefer she didn’t.
Please stand, for Borat's rendition of the Kazakhstan National Anthem:
But finally, today, Great Leader Of Kansastan declared mercy on sniveling, coddled Ute In Government:
“My staff over-reacted to this tweet, and for that I apologize. Freedom of speech is among our most treasured freedoms. I enjoyed speaking to the more than 100 students who participated in the Youth in Government Program at the Kansas Capitol. They are our future. I also want to thank the thousands of Kansas educators who remind us daily of our liberties, as well as the values of civility and decorum. Again, I apologize for our over-reaction”
Over-reacting staff will volunteer to be strapped to fence posts and function instead as tornado early-warning system.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
Friday, November 25, 2011
DMTC Master Cast List, Version 2.0
Several years ago, as Davis Musical Theatre Company (DMTC) Historian, I compiled a Master Cast List for DMTC in an Excel spreadsheet.
Tonight, I completed an update (Version 2.0) to that Master Cast List. That list will be provided to DMTC Producer Steve Isaacson, who hopes to make it available, to all, as a database accessible online from the DMTC Web Site. The list represents all regular-season DMTC Main Stage and Young Performers’ shows (but not yet irregular shows, such as Summer Workshops, Teen Cabarets, etc.), and is 99% complete (there are a few missing programs from the 90’s).
Nevertheless, I would like to gauge the interest people might have in receiving a copy of their own, as an Excel spreadsheet. I need to complete a write-up describing the list, so I’m still a few days from making it available.
The Master Cast List (Excel spreadsheet size = 8,345 KB) contains 18,600 lines, representing the efforts of 3,785 people in 270 shows spanning 27 seasons, from June, 1984 to November, 2011. That is actually a surprisingly-small number of people: only 14 new people, on average, are introduced to the theater per show, indicating how many people return again and again to DMTC, and thus just how much fun it is doing community theater shows.
Let me know, in comments, if you are interested in receiving your own list, and I will get back in touch. Then, once I make it available, I can start on Version 3.0 of the Master Cast List, which will contain irregular shows, such as Summer Workshops, Teen Cabarets, etc.
Tonight, I completed an update (Version 2.0) to that Master Cast List. That list will be provided to DMTC Producer Steve Isaacson, who hopes to make it available, to all, as a database accessible online from the DMTC Web Site. The list represents all regular-season DMTC Main Stage and Young Performers’ shows (but not yet irregular shows, such as Summer Workshops, Teen Cabarets, etc.), and is 99% complete (there are a few missing programs from the 90’s).
Nevertheless, I would like to gauge the interest people might have in receiving a copy of their own, as an Excel spreadsheet. I need to complete a write-up describing the list, so I’m still a few days from making it available.
The Master Cast List (Excel spreadsheet size = 8,345 KB) contains 18,600 lines, representing the efforts of 3,785 people in 270 shows spanning 27 seasons, from June, 1984 to November, 2011. That is actually a surprisingly-small number of people: only 14 new people, on average, are introduced to the theater per show, indicating how many people return again and again to DMTC, and thus just how much fun it is doing community theater shows.
Let me know, in comments, if you are interested in receiving your own list, and I will get back in touch. Then, once I make it available, I can start on Version 3.0 of the Master Cast List, which will contain irregular shows, such as Summer Workshops, Teen Cabarets, etc.
Thursday, November 24, 2011
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Awkward Time To Bring Up The GPA
So apparently Dr. Doug Brinkley is a well-known historian from Rice University, whereas Rep. Don Young (AK - R) once went to Yuba College:
Things went south when Young called Brinkley “Mr. Rice” and said his testimony is “garbage.” Brinkley then goes on the attack: “It’s Dr. Brinkley. Rice is a university. I know you went to Yuba College and couldn’t graduate.”
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Surreptitious Bag Exchange Late At Night In The Home Depot Parking Lot
J.: So, you brought the Quikcrete?
M.: Yes. Sorry I first brought the Sancrete. Damn, that bag is heavy!
J.: I need it for dry wall.
M.: The security guard is looking at us.
J.: I better leave.
M.: Yes. Sorry I first brought the Sancrete. Damn, that bag is heavy!
J.: I need it for dry wall.
M.: The security guard is looking at us.
J.: I better leave.
Secretary of State Dianna Duran Found The Only Person In New Mexico Committing Voter Fraud, And Ran Him Over
Or so it seemed to me, reading the news:
New Mexico Secretary of State Dianna Duran said earlier this year that her state had a “culture of corruption” and referred 64,000 voter registration records to police that she thought were possible cases of voter fraud.Then:
...Duran’s interim report now alleges that 104 voters — about one for every 10,577 on the rolls — were illegally registered to vote. Of that group, just 19 — or approximately one for every 57,894 registered voters — actually allegedly cast a ballot they shouldn’t have.
Broncho was killed Thursday night on New Mexico 599 as he was walking alone near Camino La Tierra.
His body was then hit by at least three other vehicles, including that of Secretary of State Dianna Duran.
Duran released a statement saying she was shocked at learning she had run over a person and not an animal.
Occupy UC Davis Rally, Noontime, 11/21/11
Here's a video I took at the noontime Occupy UC Davis Rally on Monday, November 21.
Just before UCD Chancellor Linda Katehi was to speak, very popular (and Untenured) Assistant Professor of English Nathan Brown vigorously-dissected Chancellor Katehi's recent public proclamations, excoriating her blame-shifting.
The video starts in the middle of Brown's speech. People lean in to capture pictures of Chancellor Katehi's facial reactions. Calls of "Resign!" filled the air.
In her speech, Katehi apologized, but did not resign.
Monday, November 21, 2011
Occupy UC Davis Rally, Noon On The Quad, November 21, 2011
I had to participate in a workplace conference call in Sacramento at 11 a.m., but it ended earlier than I expected, so I had enough time to catch much of the noontime rally at the Quad on the University of California, Davis (UCD) campus.
Things have been pretty much in an uproar at UCD since Friday, when UC Davis cops casually hosed down protesters with pepper spray in an astonishing display of police violence. Videos went viral worldwide. Calls for UCD Chancellor Linda Katehi's resignation have been resounding since then.
Chancellor Katehi was scheduled to speak at the rally too, which made it even more interesting, since I couldn't figure out how she would resist the resignation calls and still maintain her dignity. Very unlike life in places like the UK, where officials resign all the time for transgressions big and small, and sometimes for no transgressions at all, but for points of honor.
In American public life, officials almost never resign, no matter how odious their conduct. Resignation is akin to annihilation. People never, ever resign willingly, ever! So, what would Katehi do?
As it happened, I was standing not far from the speaker's stand, when Chancellor Katehi quietly sidled up close: not more than twelve feet away. As time passed, and her speaking time approached, more and more photographers from the news media clustered around to take photos. So, I had an unusual vantage point at this rally: able to see her, the speakers, and the crowd virtually simultaneously....
Various speakers who had been either arrested or pepper-sprayed on Friday spoke about their tribulations.
As an introduction to Chancellor Katehi's speech, very popular (and Untenured) Assistant Professor of English Nathan Brown roasted and vigorously-dissected Chancellor Katehi's recent public proclamations, analyzing and disparaging her blame-shifting and flights of fancy. People leaned in to capture pictures of Katehi's reactions. Calls of "Resign!" filled the air.
As it happened, my camera's memory filled to the brim just as Katehi started speaking, so I have no record of that, but it hardly matters. Her speech was so anticlimactic, even pathetic, that it made me wonder if she is just a figurehead for the real power at UCD, which might very well reside in its police forces.
Chancellor Katehi apologized to the students, in a fashion. Quoting from here:
But Katehi did not resign. Instead, she declared her willingness to dialog with students, and to get to know the students better, for which there would be more opportunities over the next several weeks. Then she made a feeble effort to assert solidarity with the students. "Do you know that plaque over there?" she asked, while pointing vaguely northwards. "November 17, 1973. I was there!"
I'm not familiar with the history of UCD: presumably the plaque in question honored a past demonstration? So, it was time to check around.
Cloudminder indicates that it was the Athens Polytechnic Uprising: not a UCD demonstration. Which just begs the question, why would UCD students give Katehi 'street cred' for the martyrs of 11/17/73, when there were more-immediate near-martyrs available, standing right in front of everyone, for 11/18/11? The disconnect was painful to witness!
And that was that! Afterwards, more speakers spoke, and the Occupy UCD organizers got down to the more quotidian (but essential) business of passing resolutions, including a demand to disband the UCD Police Force.
How does Katehi recover from this? Respect, once totally lost, is very hard to gain back.
I'm impressed by the organization of the Occupy UC Davis protesters. They are coordinating closely with their counterparts in Oakland and Berkeley, so there is fertile sharing of experience. The emergence of cell phone and Internet technology over the last two decades, and creative use of older methods (e.g., the 'human microphone'), enables much-tighter control over large audiences than protesters in the Sixties were able to manage. Less time wasted too. Even new protest lingo is emerging (e.g., 'stack', for the list of speakers).
The best to them!
Various protesters who were pepper-sprayed on Friday, or arrested, or both, testify about their painful experiences.
Capturing the moment on an i-Pad.
UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi quietly arrives with her security detail.
A veteran who was pepper-sprayed too.
Pepper-sprayed in Palestine, and pepper-sprayed in Davis too!
More testifying.
This is the Occupy protester who suffered the nerve damage to his left hand (clearly visible). Quoting from Boing-Boing:
And yet more testifying!
As an introduction to Chancellor Katehi's speech, very popular (and Untenured) Assistant Professor of English Nathan Brown excoriated Chancellor Katehi's recent public proclamations, and analyzed her blame-shifting and evasions.
The heat is on.
I was mystified by this balloon. I understand that Occupy UC Berkeley is using balloons to float tents above Sproul Hall, in order to creatively evade anti-camping rules. Is something like that being considered here as well?
Things have been pretty much in an uproar at UCD since Friday, when UC Davis cops casually hosed down protesters with pepper spray in an astonishing display of police violence. Videos went viral worldwide. Calls for UCD Chancellor Linda Katehi's resignation have been resounding since then.
Chancellor Katehi was scheduled to speak at the rally too, which made it even more interesting, since I couldn't figure out how she would resist the resignation calls and still maintain her dignity. Very unlike life in places like the UK, where officials resign all the time for transgressions big and small, and sometimes for no transgressions at all, but for points of honor.
In American public life, officials almost never resign, no matter how odious their conduct. Resignation is akin to annihilation. People never, ever resign willingly, ever! So, what would Katehi do?
As it happened, I was standing not far from the speaker's stand, when Chancellor Katehi quietly sidled up close: not more than twelve feet away. As time passed, and her speaking time approached, more and more photographers from the news media clustered around to take photos. So, I had an unusual vantage point at this rally: able to see her, the speakers, and the crowd virtually simultaneously....
Various speakers who had been either arrested or pepper-sprayed on Friday spoke about their tribulations.
As an introduction to Chancellor Katehi's speech, very popular (and Untenured) Assistant Professor of English Nathan Brown roasted and vigorously-dissected Chancellor Katehi's recent public proclamations, analyzing and disparaging her blame-shifting and flights of fancy. People leaned in to capture pictures of Katehi's reactions. Calls of "Resign!" filled the air.
As it happened, my camera's memory filled to the brim just as Katehi started speaking, so I have no record of that, but it hardly matters. Her speech was so anticlimactic, even pathetic, that it made me wonder if she is just a figurehead for the real power at UCD, which might very well reside in its police forces.
Chancellor Katehi apologized to the students, in a fashion. Quoting from here:
“I am here to apologize,” she said. “I feel horrible. I don’t want to be the chancellor of the university we had on Friday.”Sounds like an easy-to-remedy problem there! Resign! Just resign! I started shouting "Resign!" along with many others.
But Katehi did not resign. Instead, she declared her willingness to dialog with students, and to get to know the students better, for which there would be more opportunities over the next several weeks. Then she made a feeble effort to assert solidarity with the students. "Do you know that plaque over there?" she asked, while pointing vaguely northwards. "November 17, 1973. I was there!"
I'm not familiar with the history of UCD: presumably the plaque in question honored a past demonstration? So, it was time to check around.
Cloudminder indicates that it was the Athens Polytechnic Uprising: not a UCD demonstration. Which just begs the question, why would UCD students give Katehi 'street cred' for the martyrs of 11/17/73, when there were more-immediate near-martyrs available, standing right in front of everyone, for 11/18/11? The disconnect was painful to witness!
And that was that! Afterwards, more speakers spoke, and the Occupy UCD organizers got down to the more quotidian (but essential) business of passing resolutions, including a demand to disband the UCD Police Force.
How does Katehi recover from this? Respect, once totally lost, is very hard to gain back.
I'm impressed by the organization of the Occupy UC Davis protesters. They are coordinating closely with their counterparts in Oakland and Berkeley, so there is fertile sharing of experience. The emergence of cell phone and Internet technology over the last two decades, and creative use of older methods (e.g., the 'human microphone'), enables much-tighter control over large audiences than protesters in the Sixties were able to manage. Less time wasted too. Even new protest lingo is emerging (e.g., 'stack', for the list of speakers).
The best to them!
Various protesters who were pepper-sprayed on Friday, or arrested, or both, testify about their painful experiences.
Capturing the moment on an i-Pad.
UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi quietly arrives with her security detail.
A veteran who was pepper-sprayed too.
Pepper-sprayed in Palestine, and pepper-sprayed in Davis too!
More testifying.
This is the Occupy protester who suffered the nerve damage to his left hand (clearly visible). Quoting from Boing-Boing:They handcuffed the students so tightly. One kid, later on they were unable to cut off his ties, they'd been tied so tight. One of the other students couldn't feel his hands they were so purple, his circulation was cut off so badly for so long. He took himself to the hospital after he was released from the zip-tie restraints. They told him he had nerve damage and not to expect to be able to feel his hands for the next week. He has to come back next week to see if there was permanent nerve damage in his wrists.
And yet more testifying!
As an introduction to Chancellor Katehi's speech, very popular (and Untenured) Assistant Professor of English Nathan Brown excoriated Chancellor Katehi's recent public proclamations, and analyzed her blame-shifting and evasions.
The heat is on.
I was mystified by this balloon. I understand that Occupy UC Berkeley is using balloons to float tents above Sproul Hall, in order to creatively evade anti-camping rules. Is something like that being considered here as well?Sunday, November 20, 2011
UC Davis Decides To Start Playing Rough
So here's the woman that Atrios helpfully labels "The Worst Person In The World".
And I have to agree. Not for a moment do I think the University of California at Davis (UC Davis, or UCD) police pepper-sprayed the students on their own authority. No, this order to get rough came from the top. And the reason the Administration is getting rough is that Occupy UC Davis finally got their attention, and they want to hurt them.
University Administrators do not live in the same community that faculty and students do. For decades now, Administrators have had their own job track, which is quite divorced from everyone else's, and has little to do with either learning or teaching. Administrators don't really know many students, and thus, to them, students seem shadowy creatures; subhuman perhaps, or, more accurately, almost human. Students don't become fully-human until they become fully-employed alumni, at which time they can contribute to the Annual Fund.
The rapid acceleration in the cost of education of the last decade is of little concern to Administrators, since they benefit from that acceleration, so the sacrifices that that acceleration is causing among students seem of little moment. It is exasperating to students and faculty alike that when they speak to Administrators, it's like speaking to deaf people. What hurts students helps Administrators, and vice-versa.
So, Administrators and Students stare across a rapidly-growing gulf of misunderstanding. Students and faculty labor under the impression they have more clout than they really do. Administrators understand, however, that the role of faculty and students is to obey. Obey them, specifically.
So, the various protests at UC Davis over the last three years have only served to irritate the Administration. So, what do Administrators do when faced with insolent refusals to obey?
Administrators do what bureaucrats often do in this situation. They carefully-calibrate escalating punishments so as to dissuade further inconvenience. Because, to Administrators, the proper course of action is quite logical and clear: it's just a matter of compelling people, with increasingly-forceful methods if need be, to obey.
The targets of persuasion are usually quite bewildered, however. To them, the recommendations of the Authorities are often illogical and haphazard. Instead of compliance, obstreperous rebellion results.
The classic case of escalation failing in application, of course, is Vietnam. The Johnson Administration thought its actions in support of the South Vietnamese people were quite reasonable, balancing careful applications of force with efforts not to offend the Soviet Union or the Chinese. As historical records have made clear, however, the North Vietnamese never understood at all what the United States was doing. To them, it looked liked foreign conquest, pure and simple. They resisted. Before long, the United States had dropped more bombs on Southeast Asia than they had ever dropped in Europe in WWII. Compliance did not result: quite the opposite.
But there were other examples where escalation was practiced domestically: specifically, and more to the point, the Free Speech Movement at UC Berkeley in the mid-60's. Reasonable people on both sides were soon literally at each other's throats:
Blogger Digby has been warning for years now that the militarization of police forces following 9/11 (tasers, bean bag guns, pepper spray, sound cannons, water cannons, etc.) has given them unwarranted confidence that they can indeed escalate dangerous situations without harm or consequences to themselves. The consequences will be increasing threats to our democracy from unaccountable, even fascistic, police forces. She's right! The UCD incident on Friday is a prime example of this development.
Most of my information this weekend came from Facebook.
Christina was here, at the Walk of Shame, where Chancellor Katehi left Surge II hours after originally scheduled and walked to her car, but only after an agreement was negotiated to allow the students to gather on just one side of the walkway.
(As an aside, I have to admire the way that UCD alumnus Christina usually ends up on both sides of any arbitrary division she encounters in the human race: both in the Greek system, and outside of it; both sides of the town/gown divide in Davis - DMTC (town) and UCD (gown); both an actor and on the Board at DMTC. I'm sure the only reason she isn't an Administrator herself, as well as an alumnus, is that she's just been busy lately. In any event, it makes her an unusually well-informed participant in, and reporter of, events at UCD.)
As I was saying, what is not so clear in the video (but as Christina relays) is that Katehi made eye contact with each and every student lining the walkway, and vice-versa. The shaming was complete from the students' perspective: from the Administrators' perspective, however, we still don't know. For all we know, Katehi may have silently pitied what she might have thought were these poor, misguided Morlochs. But if it's any consolation, Digby (and many others) give the highest credit to the UCD students:
I have to give the students at UC Davis a big round of applause. Not only did they show tremendous restraint and maturity in enduring that pepper spray assault, they skillfully organized the most effective possible response
The best reporting so far seems to be coming from Boing-Boing (h/t Karina). It's clear that there was plenty of dialog between the police and the students. There was no misunderstanding between them, or indeed, any police overreaction in the press of events. The police didn't panic. No, they were acting under orders. And those orders were to cause pain.
Much has been made of the fact that the police felt compelled to act because they were surrounded. But this was no siege: it wasn't something from the movie 'Zulu'. Being surrounded doesn't mean being aggressively surrounded; it just means being encircled. (This ambiguity may have escaped the Administrators' attention, but it certainly didn't escape the attention of the police).
To the police, being surrounded was important as a bureaucratic check box. Once the police were 'surrounded', they had carte blanche to do whatever they pleased to whomever they wished. And it's simple choreography to get surrounded: you just walk into a group of people. Once you are 'surrounded' your actions are completely covered and you can do any depraved thing without consequence. Like hurting people. With military-grade weaponry. As they had been instructed to do. Because Occupy UC Davis won't obey, and must be taught a lesson:
W. tells Boing Boing that Pike sprayed them at close range with military-grade pepper spray, in a punitive manner. Pike knew the students by name from Thursday night when they "occupied" a campus plaza. The students offered Pike food and coffee and chatted with him and other officers while setting up tents. On Friday, UC Davis chancellor Linda Katehi told students they had to remove their #OWS tents for unspecified "health and safety" reasons.So, where do we go from here?
"Move or we're going to shoot you," Pike is reported to have yelled at one student right before delivering pepper spray. Then, turning to his fellow officers and brandishing the can in the air, "Don't worry, I'm going to spray these kids down."
...So the Tuesday protest was one of the biggest rallies on the campus since tuition hikes in 2009. That protest ended with a march around the campus, which led us to the administrative building. Sort of spontaneously, we all decided to occupy an area on the grounds and we stayed the night. The administration allowed it. I had a wonderful conversation with Lieutenant Pike that night. I dialogued with him for a while. He was cordial to me. He knew me by name. We offered him coffee and food.
On Wednesday there was the big protest in San Francisco, and striking at the UC regents meeting over the proposed 81% tuition increase next year. The regents actually canceled their meeting because they knew we were coming, and they have since decided to do it by teleconference next Monday so we can't disrupt them.
UC Davis police cleared out the 15 or so protesters who remained in Mrak Hall while the rest of the occupiers had left for the demonstration in San Francisco.
We had another rally on Thursday, with a big General Assembly. We decided to have an occupation against the injustices we were facing, and on Thursday night there were 35 tents set up, with more planning on coming.
...So, everyone removed the tents, and they were in the process of arresting more people. A collective decision was made on the fly to just sit in a circle arms linked legs crossed, with police officers and "prisoners" in the middle because we didn't want them arresting only 3 of us. It wasn't fair that 50 of us were there, and only a few arrested who hadn't volunteered to be arrested. There was still one walkway open that the police were going to use to walk the arrestees out. I saw some friends of mine sit down there, and they were my friends, so I joined them. We linked arms, legs crossed.
We were never warned that we were going to be pepper-sprayed.
Lt. Pike walked up to my friend, and I am told that he said, "Move or we're going to shoot you."
Then he went back and talked to a few of his police officer friends. A couple of other officers started to remove people who were sitting there, blocking exit. Pike could have easily removed us, just picked us up and removed us. We were just sitting there, nonviolent civil disobedience.
But Pike turned around and I am told that he said to the other officers, "Don't worry about it, I'm going to spray these kids down."
He lifts the can, spins it around in a circle to show it off to everybody.
Then he sprays us three times.
As if one time of being sprayed at point blank wasn't enough.
Interesting! The UCD incident is big on BBC at the moment. If it bleeds; it leads!
There is the big rally at noon on Monday (I want to be there, but I forgot about a 11 a.m. conference call I'm supposed to be in on.) So, I might have to lean on Facebook again to understand what is actually going on there.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)